The defense argues that the case is vindictive and discriminatory, and that the violations were not laid out clearly — claims strongly disputed by prosecutors.
Source
The defense argues that the case is vindictive and discriminatory, and that the violations were not laid out clearly — claims strongly disputed by prosecutors.
cAKErESUME. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .